Category: Money Moves Markets

The most important issue in the global economic outlook is the meaning of Chinese monetary weakness.

Six-month rates of change of narrow / broad money, bank lending and total social financing (on both new and old definitions*) reached record lows in June / July – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Monetary weakness has been entirely focused on the corporate sector: M2 deposits of non-financial enterprises plunged 6.6% (13.6% annualised) in the six months to July (own seasonal adjustment) – chart 2.

Chart 2

Recent regulatory changes appear to account for only a small portion of the corporate broad money decline.

A clampdown on banks paying interest above regulatory ceilings has resulted in a shift out of demand deposits but money has largely stayed in the banking system – available data suggest modest inflows to wealth management products and other non-monetary assets.

The clampdown has also discouraged the practice of “fund idling” (round-tripping in UK monetary parlance), whereby banks offered loans to corporate borrowers to meet official lending targets, with borrowers incentivised to hold the funds on deposit.

If an unwinding of such activity accounted for the decline in corporate money, however, short-term bank lending to corporations would be expected to show equivalent weakness. Such lending has continued to grow, albeit at a slower pace recently, as have longer-term loans.

A trend decline in the ratio of corporate M2 deposits to bank borrowing, therefore, has accelerated – chart 3.

Chart 3

Household money holdings, by contrast, have been growing solidly – chart 2. An alternative explanation for the corporate money decline is simply that households are still hunkering down as the property crisis deepens, with weakening demand for consumer goods / services and housing transferring income and liquidity from the corporate sector.

The latest PBoC and NBS consumer surveys confirm rock-bottom sentiment – chart 4. If this explanation is correct, corporate money weakness may presage a collapse in profits – chart 5.

Chart 4

Chart 5

Why hasn’t the PBoC hit the panic button? Policy easing has been constrained by currency weakness: the most comprehensive measure of f/x intervention (h/t Brad Setser) reached $58 billion in July, the highest since 2016 – chart 6. The recent yen rally has offered some relief, reflected in a narrower offshore forward discount, but the authorities may be concerned that this will prove temporary.

Chart 6

The strange policy of trying to push longer-term yields higher against a recessionary / deflationary backdrop may represent an attempt to support the currency, rather than being motivated primarily by concern about financial risks. To the extent that the policy results in banks selling bonds, however, the result will be to exacerbate monetary weakness and economic woes.

*The previous definition excludes government bonds so is a measure of credit expansion to the “real economy”.

A sharp fall in the global manufacturing PMI new orders index in July confirms renewed industrial weakness. The companion services survey, however, reported an uptick in the new business component, which is close to its post-GFC average. Will services resilience sustain respectable overall growth?

The understanding here is that economic fluctuations originate in the goods sector, reflecting cycles in three components of investment – stockbuilding, business fixed capex and housing. Multiplier effects transmit these fluctuations to the services sector – there is no independent services cycle.

The manufacturing new orders and services new business indices have been strongly correlated historically, with Granger-causality tests indicating that the former leads the latter but not vice versa*.

Several considerations suggest that the recent divergence will be resolved by the services new business index moving lower:

1. The services future output index correlates with new business and fell to an eight-month low in July – see chart 1.

Chart 1

2. Recent new business readings have been inflated by strength in financial services – chart 2. Financial services new business correlates with stock market movements, suggesting weakness ahead.

Chart 2

3. Consumer services new business correlates with the manufacturing consumer goods new orders index, which fell below 50 in July – chart 3.

Chart 3

Output price indices for consumer goods and services support the optimism here about inflation prospects through mid-2025. A weighted average has fallen back to its October 2009-December 2019 average, a period in which G7 annual CPI inflation excluding food / energy averaged 1.5% – chart 4.

Chart 4

*Contemporaneous correlation coefficient since 1998 = +0.84. Granger-causality tests included six lags. Manufacturing terms were significant in the services equation but not vice versa.

—–
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: Simon Simmonds
EMAIL:
IP: 195.167.27.8
URL:
DATE: 08/08/2024 09:22:55 PM

The rough approximarte average decline in the S&P 500 during the last 10 recessions is 32%. Smallest being around 13% for1960/1 and largest around 57% for 2008/9.

If the peak was around 16th July the drop to today, 8th Aug, is around 6%.

A post in June suggested that a recovery in the OECD’s US composite leading indicator was ending. A calculation based on the latest input data confirms a reversal lower.

The historical performance of the OECD indicator compares favourably with the Conference Board leading index. The OECD indicator recovered from early 2023, signalling that recession risk was (temporarily?) receding, while the Conference Board measure continued to weaken.

The latest published data point, for June, was released in early July. The next update is due on 5 September and will provide July / August numbers.

Chart 1 shows the published series (black), a replica series calculated here based on data available in early July (blue) and an updated replica incorporating an additional month of input data (gold). The updated series has fallen sharply from an April peak.

Chart 1

The decline reflects weakness in four components: consumer sentiment, durable goods orders, the manufacturing PMI and housing starts. The two financial components – stock prices and the 10-year Treasury yield / fed funds rate spread – were still marginally positive in July but levels so far in August imply a turn lower.

The price relative of MSCI World cyclical sectors, excluding tech, versus defensive sectors has mirrored movements in the OECD US leading indicator historically – chart 2. Relative valuation is high versus history and has diverged from a weakening global manufacturing PMI – chart 3.

Chart 2

Chart 3

Manufacturing PMI results for July support the forecast of a global “double dip” into early 2025.

The global manufacturing PMI new orders index plunged by 1.9 points from June to 48.8, a seven-month low. The combination of a one-month fall of this magnitude or greater and a sub-50 reading occurred in only 14 months since 1998, highlighted by shading in chart 1.

Chart 1

In chronological order, those months were:

• October 1998 (Asian / Russian / LTCM crises)

• December 2000 / January 2001 (start of US / global recession)

• September / October 2001 (911 terrorist attack)

• March 2003 (Iraq invasion)

• September through December 2008 (GFC climax)

• November 2011 (Eurozone crisis / recession)

• February through April 2020 (covid recession)

So the current signal suggests significant economic weakness and risk-off markets, at least until policy-makers respond.

The forecast that global economic momentum would weaken in H2 2024 was based on a fall in six-month real narrow money momentum into a low in September 2023 and an observation that the money-activity lag has recently extended to a year or more – chart 2.

Chart 2

The September 2023 real money momentum low suggests that PMI new orders will reach a low by January 2025. With money trends still weak, however, a recovery may be lacklustre.

Could PMI new orders break below the low of 46.5 reached in December 2022? The low in six-month real narrow momentum in September 2023 was beneath the preceding low in July 2022 – chart 2. Current weakness is more likely to spill over into labour markets, creating negative feedback loops.

“Surprise” economic deterioration is forecast to be accompanied by sharply weaker inflationary pressures, reflecting broad money stagnation in H2 2022 / H1 2023. The consumer goods PMI output price index fell back below its pre-pandemic average in July, following a plunge in the consumer services index the prior month – chart 3.

Chart 3

—–
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: David Cotton
EMAIL:
IP: 87.224.97.121
URL:
DATE: 08/02/2024 02:54:35 PM

Concern should probably be Labour market weakness tipping the housing cycle over in 2025. Possibly leading to a prolonged period of economic weakness.

Will the Bank of Japan’s latest attempt to exit ZIRP prove any more successful than its previous two efforts, in 2000 and 2006?

The monetary backdrop is no more promising. The six-month rate of change of broad money M3 was 0.5% annualised in June compared with 1.3% and -1.1% respectively before the August 2000 and July 2006 rate hikes – see chart 1.

Chart 1

Money growth, admittedly, has been depressed by recent record intervention to support the yen. The judgement here is that the authorities have marked out a major low in the currency – see previous post – so f/x sales are likely to slow / end.

A reduced intervention drag, however, will be offset by a contractionary monetary influence from QT. The announced phased reduction in monthly purchases implies that the BoJ’s JGB holdings will fall by about ¥8 trn during H2 2024, equivalent to an annualised 1.0% of M3.

Credit developments are superficially more supportive of policy tightening. The six-month rate of change of commercial banks’ loans and leases was 3.5% annualised in June compared with -1.9% and 2.8% before the 2000 / 2006 hikes.

Bank lending, however, is usually a lagging indicator of economic momentum, suggesting a slowdown ahead in response to recent activity weakness.

The BoJ “will … continue to raise the policy interest rate” if its outlook for economic activity and prices is realised. Headline and core CPI inflation are projected to be close to the 2% target in fiscal years 2025 and 2026 based on the output gap turning positive and a “virtuous cycle between prices and wages continuing to intensify”.

The “monetarist”  forecast, by contrast, is that inflation is heading for a big undershoot. Six-month core CPI momentum was 1.5% annualised in June*, with lagged broad money growth suggesting a further decline into 2025 – chart 2.

Chart 2

Coming Japanese inflation experience will be another test of forecasting approaches. Simplistic monetarism has trounced new Keynesian orthodoxy so far this decade. Another win for monetarist simpletons will spell third time unlucky for the BoJ.

*Own estimate adjusting for policy effects and seasonals.

Global six-month real narrow money momentum – a key indicator in the forecasting process followed here – is estimated to have moved sideways for a third month in June, based on monetary data covering 85% of the aggregate.

Real money momentum has recovered from a September 2023 low but remains below both its long-run average and the average in the 10 years preceding the GFC, when short-term interest rates were closer to recent levels – see chart 1.

Chart 1

The expectation here has been that the fall into the September 2023 low would be reflected in a weakening of global industrial momentum into late 2024. DM flash PMI results for July support this forecast, implying a fall in global manufacturing PMI new orders from 50.8 in June to below 50, assuming unchanged readings for China / EM.

Chart 2

The stalling-out of real money momentum at a weak level suggests that economic expansion will remain sub-par in early 2025.

Global six-month industrial output growth, meanwhile, recovered in April / May, crossing back above real money momentum – chart 3. The implied negative shift in “excess” money conditions may partly explain recent market weakness / rotation.

Chart 3

Global six-month real narrow money momentum was held back in May / June by weakness in China and Japan, discussed in recent notes. A US slowdown is a risk going forward.

A note in February argued that expansionary deficit financing operations – “Treasury QE” – have more than offset the monetary drag from Fed QT. Specifically, the Treasury relied on running down its cash balance at the Fed and issuing Treasury bills to fund the deficit in H2 2022 and 2023. The former represents a direct monetary injection while bill issuance is likely to expand broad money because bills are mostly purchased by money funds and banks. (A recent paper from Hudson Bay Capital makes a similar point, referring to variations in the maturity profile of debt sales as “activist Treasury issuance”.)

The February article and an update in May, however, noted that Treasury financing estimates implied that the six-month running total of Treasury QE would slow sharply in Q2 and turn negative in Q3. With Fed QT continuing, albeit at a slower pace, the joint Treasury / Fed impact on broad money was on course to become significantly contractionary.

Treasury QE has fallen as expected and the joint contribution has become negative – charts 4 and 5. Six-month broad money momentum has yet to slow significantly, although three-month growth in June was the weakest since November. Money momentum lagged when the joint impact swung from negative to positive in late 2022 / early 2023.

Chart 4

Chart 5

The approach here places greater weight on narrow than broad money for short-term forecasting. A US broad money slowdown, in theory, could be accompanied by stable or stronger narrow money expansion, for example if rising confidence leads to an increase in broad money velocity, with an associated portfolio shift into demand deposits. Such a scenario, however, is less likely the longer the Fed delays significant rate cuts.

The slowdown in Treasury QE explains a reversal lower in US bank reserves since April – chart 6. The prior rise in reserves, despite ongoing Fed balance sheet contraction, occurred because money funds were running down their deposits in the overnight reverse repo facility in order to buy newly-issued Treasury bills, with the Treasury reinjecting this cash via the deficit.

Chart 6

Japanese bank reserves are also on course to fall as the BoJ embarks on QT – chart 7. Market speculation is that the MPC will announce a reduction in gross JGB purchases to ¥3 trn per month at next week’s meeting, from an average ¥5.7 trn in H1. With redemptions averaging ¥6.5 trn over the last year, this suggests monthly QT of ¥3.5 trn ($23 bn), equivalent to 2.6% of broad money M3 at an annualised rate.

Chart 7

Chinese money trends are puzzling but ominous, suggesting – at a minimum – that the economy will remain weak through H2.

Q2 real GDP growth came in below expectations but there was better news on the nominal side: two-quarter nominal GDP expansion rose for a second quarter as the GDP deflator stabilised – see chart 1.

Chart 1

This improvement tallies with a recovery in six-month rates of change of narrow money and broad credit around end-2023. Money and credit momentum, however, has since slumped, reaching a new record low in June – chart 2.

Chart 2

A post a month ago noted that money – and to a lesser extent credit – numbers have been distorted by a regulatory clampdown on the practice of banks paying supplementary interest. This has resulted in non-financial enterprises (NFEs) moving money out of demand deposits into time deposits and non-monetary instruments such as wealth management products (WMPs), as well as repaying some debt.

The post suggested discounting narrow money weakness and focusing on an expanded broad money aggregate including WMPs. The six-month rate of change of this measure had slowed significantly but was still within – just – the historical range of six-month broad money growth.

That is no longer the case. CICC numbers on WMPs show an outflow in June. Six-month growth of the expanded measure has converged down towards that of conventional broad money – chart 3.

Chart 3

F/x intervention to support the yuan has contributed to monetary weakness but the effect has been minor. Net f/x settlement by banks – which captures spot intervention using the balance sheets of state banks and other institutions – amounted to CNY590 bn ($83 bn) or 0.2% of broad money in the six months to May (a June number is due this week).

Household money growth, it should be emphasised, is stable and respectable: broad money weakness is entirely attributable to a loss of NFE deposits – chart 4. The puzzle is the destination of the “missing” NFE money. Only a small portion is likely to have been used to repay debt: banks’ short-term corporate lending fell in April / May but rebounded to a new high in June.

Chart 4

The focus of monetary weakness on NFEs suggests downside risk to investment and hiring, with negative feedback from the latter to consumer spending.

—–
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: David Cotton
EMAIL:
IP: 81.150.175.79
URL:
DATE: 07/18/2024 08:26:18 AM

I wonder if we'll see a more dramatic policy response. It does seem policy makers are "asleep at the wheel" even as some big warning signs are flashing.

An analysis of the Fed’s historical behaviour suggests that the conditions for policy easing are in place.

Chart 1 shows the fitted values and current prediction of a logit probability model for classifying months according to whether the Fed is in policy-tightening or policy-easing mode.

Chart 1

The model’s determination for a particular month depends on values of annual core PCE inflation, the unemployment rate and the ISM manufacturing delivery delays index known at the end of the first week of the month (i.e. after the release of the employment report for the prior month).

The model can be thought of as an approximation of the Fed’s “average” reaction function over the last 60+ years. It correctly classifies 87% of months over this period, i.e. the estimated probability of being in policy-tightening mode was above 0.5 in tightening months and below 0.5 in easing months.

There is no memory effect – the model ignores whether the Fed was in tightening / easing mode in the previous month, only considering the above data series (with no dummy variables for “shocks”).

The dependent variable takes the value 1 from the month of the first rate increase in a tightening phase until the month before the first cut in a subsequent easing phase, and 0 otherwise. So a rate plateau before an easing is still classified as part of a tightening phase (and a rate floor before the first hike part of an easing phase).

The tightening / easing phases were identified judgementally and are shown by the shaded / unshaded areas in the chart. The Wu-Xia shadow rate informs the dating of phases during zero-rate periods since the GFC.

The model estimates the probability of the Fed being in tightening mode this month (July 2024) at 0.23, the lowest value since September 2021. Equivalently, the probability of a start of an easing phase is 0.77.

A fall in the tightening probability from 0.62 in March reflects a 0.2 pp rise in the unemployment rate over the last four months (from 3.9% to 4.1%) and a 0.3 pp decline in annual core PCE inflation (from 2.9% to 2.6%).

The Fed is unlikely to announce a rate cut at the conclusion of its next meeting on 31 July, as this would be at odds with recent communications (although the probability may be higher than the 0.05 implied by market pricing on 11 July, according to CME FedWatch).

The model’s shift, however, suggests a strong chance of a dovish statement teeing up a September move.

—–
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: David Cotton
EMAIL:
IP: 87.224.97.121
URL:
DATE: 07/15/2024 10:18:45 AM

They would have cut already, per your model? I think you're right that buoyant markets have delayed them this cycle.

Eurozone money trends remain too weak to support an economic recovery. A relapse in the latest business surveys could mark the start of a “double dip”.

Three-month rates of change of narrow and broad money – as measured by non-financial M1 and M3 – were zero and 3.3% annualised respectively in May. Current readings are well up on a year ago but significantly short of pre-pandemic averages – see chart 1.

Chart 1

May month-on-month changes were soft, with narrow money contracting by 0.1% and growth of the broad measure slowing to 0.1%.

Six-month real narrow money momentum – the “best” monetary leading indicator of economic direction – moved sideways in May, remaining significantly negative and lower than in other major economies. (The latest UK reading is for April.)

Chart 2

June declines in Eurozone PMIs and German Ifo expectations may represent a realignment with negative monetary trends following a temporary overshoot – chart 3. A recent correction in cyclical equity market sectors could extend if Ifo expectations stall at the current level – chart 4.

Chart 3

Chart 4

Growth of bank deposits is similar in France, Germany and Spain but lagging in Italy – chart 5. The country numbers warrant heightened scrutiny, given a risk that French political turmoil triggers deposit flight to Germany.

Chart 5

—–
COMMENT:
AUTHOR: David Cotton
EMAIL:
IP: 73.16.192.213
URL:
DATE: 06/28/2024 01:47:30 PM

We should probably consider what the economic outlook would be from such historically weak money growth without the overhang of prior covid stimulus.

Central banks have been lulled in to a false sense of the security by the prior stimulus. Neutral interest rates are probably much, much lower than they think.

Meanwhile the lagged effects of monetary tightening have also been vastly underestimated.

Possibly any renewed downturn will take a long period of time for monetary policy to counteract.

A recovery in the OECD’s US composite leading indicator could be reversing, in which case recent underperformance of cyclical equity market sectors versus defensives could extend.

The OECD indicator receives less attention than the Conference Board US leading economic index but its historical performance compares favourably.

The correlation coefficient of six-month rates of change is maximised with a two-month lag on the OECD indicator, i.e. the OECD measure slightly leads the Conference Board index.

The OECD indicator recovered from early 2023, signalling that recession risk was (temporarily?) receding. The Conference Board index continued to weaken, although the rate of decline slowed.

The latest published numbers show the OECD measure still rising in May. New information, however, is available for four of the seven components. An updated calculation suggests that the indicator peaked in April, with small declines in May and June – see chart 1.

Chart 1

A firmer indication will be available at the end of next week, following release of data on the remaining three components – durable goods orders, the ISM manufacturing PMI and manufacturing average weekly hours.

The suggested stall in the OECD leading indicator recovery has coincided with larger month-on-month declines in the Conference Board measure in April and May.

The price relative of MSCI World cyclical sectors, excluding tech, versus defensive sectors has mirrored movements in the OECD US leading indicator historically – chart 2. A rally in the relative peaked in late March, consistent with the suggestion of an April leading indicator top.

Chart 2